MULTISINTESIS EKSISTENSIAL, TERHADAP TATA KELOLA NEGARA DAN REPOSISI KESEJAHTERAAN PUBLIK

Authors

  • Resmiati Resmiati Akademi Keperawatan Berkala Widya Husada
  • Yudhi Hertanto Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51878/yurisdiksi.v1i2.13770

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Modern state governance often equates digitalization and bureaucratic rationalization with the achievement of public welfare. However, the excessive integration of surveillance technologies and administrative rationality may undermine citizens' freedom, participation, and human dignity. This article aims to synthesize the philosophical perspectives of George Orwell, Franz Kafka, and Albert Camus to examine the pathologies of contemporary public governance. The novelty of this study lies in developing a conceptual synthesis that integrates the ideas of Orwell, Kafka, and Camus into a new analytical framework for critically examining technology-driven public governance. This study employs a qualitative method using a critical hermeneutic approach and conceptual analysis through the stages of identifying, interpreting, comparing, and synthesizing the major works of the three thinkers alongside relevant scholarly literature. The findings reveal that public welfare cannot be adequately measured solely by bureaucratic efficiency and technological advancement but must also encompass human freedom, agency, and social solidarity. The study further produces a conceptual synthesis demonstrating that Orwell's critique of surveillance, Kafka's analysis of impersonal bureaucracy, and Camus' notion of existential rebellion collectively provide a new perspective for understanding the challenges of modern public governance. These findings contribute to the theoretical development of public administration and political philosophy by offering a more human-centered framework for evaluating technology-based governance.

ABSTRAK

Tata kelola negara modern kerap menjadikan digitalisasi dan birokrasi sebagai indikator utama pencapaian kesejahteraan publik. Namun, integrasi teknologi pengawasan dan rasionalitas administratif yang berlebihan berpotensi mengurangi kebebasan, partisipasi, dan martabat warga negara. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mensintesis pemikiran George Orwell, Franz Kafka, dan Albert Camus dalam mengkaji patologi tata kelola negara kontemporer. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada pengembangan sintesis konseptual yang mengintegrasikan perspektif Orwell, Kafka, dan Camus sebagai kerangka analitis untuk mengkritisi tata kelola publik berbasis teknologi. Penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan hermeneutika kritis dan analisis konseptual melalui identifikasi, interpretasi, komparasi, dan sintesis terhadap karya utama ketiga tokoh serta literatur pendukung. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kesejahteraan publik tidak cukup diukur melalui efisiensi birokrasi dan teknologi, tetapi juga harus mempertimbangkan kebebasan, agensi manusia, dan solidaritas sosial. Penelitian ini menghasilkan sintesis konseptual yang memperlihatkan keterkaitan kritik Orwell terhadap pengawasan, analisis Kafka tentang birokrasi impersonal, dan gagasan Camus mengenai pemberontakan eksistensial sebagai perspektif baru dalam memahami tata kelola publik modern. Temuan ini memperkaya kajian administrasi publik dan filsafat politik dengan menawarkan kerangka evaluasi yang lebih humanis terhadap praktik pemerintahan berbasis teknologi.

References

Alshahrani, A., Griva, A., Dennehy, D., & Mäntymäki, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence and decision-making in government functions: opportunities, challenges and future research. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 18(4), 678-698. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-06-2024-0131

Anshari, M., Hamdan, M., Ahmad, N., & Ali, E. (2025). Public service delivery, artificial intelligence and the sustainable development goals: trends, evidence and complexities. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 16(1), 163-181. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-07-2023-0123

Aprianti, N., & Damayanti, G. A. R. (2025). Negara Hukum di Era Algoritma: Algoritma Reformulasi Regulasi Artificial Intelligence untuk Menjamin Perlindungan HAM di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Agama Hindu Widya Kerta, 8(2), 98-109. https://doi.org/10.53977/wk.v8i2.3312

Babšek, M., Ravšelj, D., Umek, L., & Aristovnik, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence adoption in public administration: An overview of top-cited articles and practical applications. AI, 6(3), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai6030044

Branchini, B., & Vallina Acha, B. (2025). Use and application of artificial intelligence in public policy evaluation. A scoping review. https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/230119

Criado, J. I., Sandoval-Almazán, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2025). Artificial intelligence and public administration: Understanding actors, governance, and policy from micro, meso, and macro perspectives. Public Policy and Administration, 40(2), 173-184.

https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767241272921

David, G. (2024). Artificial intelligence: Opportunities and challenges for public administration. Canadian Public Administration, 67(3), 388-406. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12580

de Fine Licht, K. (2025). Resolving value conflicts in public AI governance: A procedural justice framework. Government Information Quarterly, 42(2), 102033. 10.1016/j.giq.2025.102033

de Fine Licht, K., & Folland, A. (2025). AI in Public Decision?Making: A Philosophical and Practical Framework for Assessing and Weighing Harm and Benefit. Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.70029

Djatmiko, G. H., Sinaga, O., & Pawirosumarto, S. (2025). Digital transformation and social inclusion in public services: A qualitative analysis of e-government adoption for marginalized communities in sustainable governance. Sustainability, 17(7), 2908. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072908

Donatz-Fest, I. C. (2024). Organizing for Responsible Algorithmization. Information Polity, 15701255261456427. https://doi.org/10.1177/15701255261456427

Gritsenko, D., & Wood, M. (2022). Algorithmic governance: A modes of governance approach. Regulation & Governance, 16(1), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12367

Gunasekara, L., El-Haber, N., Nagpal, S., Moraliyage, H., Issadeen, Z., Manic, M., & De Silva, D. (2025). A systematic review of responsible artificial intelligence principles and practice. Applied System Innovation, 8(4), 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi8040097

Halim, D., Herman, H., Susilawati, A. C., El Adawiyah, P. R., Has, N. I., & Zumarina, Z. (2025). Etika Pelayanan Publik diera Digital Governance: Kajian Filsafat Administrasi Publik. The Indonesian Journal of Public Administration (IJPA), 11(2), 41-65. https://doi.org/10.52447/ijpa.v11i2.8985

Irfan, B., & Anirwan, A. (2023). Pelayanan publik era digital: Studi literatur. Indonesian Journal of Intellectual Publication, 4(1), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.51577/ijipublication.v4i1.477

Judijanto, L., & Harsya, R. M. K. (2025). Etika dan Hukum dalam Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence terhadap Privasi Digital di Indonesia. Sanskara Hukum dan HAM, 3(03), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.58812/shh.v3i03.543

Mergel, I., Ganapati, S., & Whitford, A. B. (2021). Agile: A new way of governing. Public administration review, 81(1), 161-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13202

Nada, F., Abqori, F. F., RH, D. R. N. F., Rahadiyan, I., & Riswandi, B. A. (2024, July). Gagasan pengaturan artificial intelligence sebagai subjek hukum di Indonesia. In Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia (pp. 149-157). https://journal.uii.ac.id/psha/article/view/35472

Nambiar, A., & Mundra, D. (2022). An overview of data warehouse and data lake in modern enterprise data management. Big data and cognitive computing, 6(4), 132. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc6040132

Nggilu, R., & Mokodongan, R. (2026). Model Manajemen SDM Publik Berbasis Kompetensi Digital dan Etika Pelayanan Publik (Studi Konseptual pada Dinas Kepegawaian Kota Gorontalo). Jurnal Agregasi: Aksi Reformasi Government dalam Demokrasi, 14(1), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.34010/agregasi.v14i1.19144

Nugroho, M. F. A., Hanim, S. N., & Delgado, L. A. (2026). Beyond Regulatory Fragmentation: Developing a Global Administrative AI Governance Framework for Cross-Border Artificial Intelligence Systems. Justicia Insight, 2(2), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.70716/justin.v2i2.383

Palese, R. (2026). Artificial truth: Algorithmic power, epistemic authority, and the crisis of democratic knowledge. Societies, 16(3), 102. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16030102

Panda, M., Hossain, M. M., Puri, R., & Ahmad, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence in action: shaping the future of public sector. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 27(6), 668-686. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-10-2024-0272

Pratiwi, S. F., Zalukhu, L. A., Tesa, A. R., & Saputra, B. (2025). Implementasi digital pada tata kelola administrasi: upaya meningkatkan mutu pelayanan di era birokrasi modern. Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 2(11). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15521459

Ruvalcaba?Gomez, E. A., & Garcia?Benitez, V. H. (2025). The Multiple Streams Framework: A Lens for Understanding Artificial Intelligence Adoption in the Public Sector. Policy & Internet, 17(4), e70021. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.70021

Sarjito, A., & Djati, S. P. (2025). Implikasi kompetensi digital aparatur sipil negara milenial terhadap reformasi birokrasi digital di era transformasi pemerintahan. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 21(1), 87-109. https://doi.org/10.52316/jap.v21i1.610

Shin, D. (2026). Automating epistemology: How AI reconfigures truth, authority, and verification. Ai & Society, 41(2), 1553-1559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02560-y

Sigurjonsson, T. O., Jónsson, E., & Gudmundsdottir, S. (2024). Sustainability of digital initiatives in public services in digital transformation of local government: Insights and implications. Sustainability, 16(24), 10827. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162410827

Susilawati, F. E., Yanti, R., & Erni, E. (2023). Transformasi Digital Pemerintah (Studi Kasus: Implementasi e-Government dan Hambatannya). Journal Social Society, 3(2), 80-94. https://doi.org/10.54065/jss.3.2.2023.338

Tanjung, M. A. (2026). Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia Dalam Era Artificial Intelligence: Rekonstruksi Kebijakan Hukum Indonesia Berbasis Prinsip Kemanusiaan. Journal of Law and Humanity Studies, 3(1), 38-42. https://doi.org/10.59613/khbvpk68

Vatamanu, A. F., & Tofan, M. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence into public administration: Challenges and vulnerabilities. Administrative Sciences, 15(4), 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15040149

Downloads

Published

2026-08-25

How to Cite

Resmiati, R., & Hertanto, Y. (2026). MULTISINTESIS EKSISTENSIAL, TERHADAP TATA KELOLA NEGARA DAN REPOSISI KESEJAHTERAAN PUBLIK. YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 1(2), 268–280. https://doi.org/10.51878/yurisdiksi.v1i2.13770

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)