PERSPECTIVES OF LECTURERS AND ITS IMPACT ON STUDENTS: THE INTEGRATION OF MENTAL HEALTH LITERACY INTO THE HIGHER EDUCATION CURRICULUM

Authors

  • Melly Maulin Purwaningwulan Communication Science Department, Universitas Komputer Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Yasundari Yasundari Communication Science Department, Universitas Komputer Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Ghaitsa Amalia Communication Science Department, Universitas Komputer Indonesia, Indonesia
  • Syahman Widyan Danuwiranta Communication Science Department, Universitas Komputer Indonesia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51878/paedagogy.v6i4.13638

Keywords:

Mental Health Literacy, Curriculum Integration, Psychological Well-Being, Academic Achievement, Higher Education

Abstract

ABSTRACT

This study is motivated by growing attention to students’ mental health, while the integration of mental health literacy into higher education curricula has not yet become a priority. This study aims to examine lecturers’ perspectives, attitudes, and willingness to integrate mental health literacy into learning, assess its potential impact on students’ mental well-being and academic achievement, and identify challenges and opportunities for implementation. The study employed a concurrent embedded mixed-methods design. Qualitative data as the primary data were collected through semi-structured interviews with eight informants consisting of four structural officials/lecturers, one psychologist as an expert informant, and three students, as well as observations and document analysis, and were analyzed thematically. Quantitative data as supporting data were obtained through a Likert-scale questionnaire administered to 100 active students at Universitas Komputer Indonesia, selected randomly and proportionally based on faculty representation, and analyzed descriptively using frequency percentages. The findings indicate that lecturers generally held positive attitudes toward integrating mental health literacy, but their willingness to implement it varied due to limited competence and institutional support. A total of 68% of students strongly agreed that good mental health supports learning focus, while 63% strongly agreed that mental health is important for academic success. The main challenges included limited curriculum time, inadequate training, and the absence of structured guidelines. The study concludes that an implicit integration model (embedded model) through learning materials, methods, assignments, and classroom interactions is relevant to supporting student well-being.

ABSTRAK

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh meningkatnya perhatian terhadap kesehatan mental mahasiswa, sementara integrasi literasi kesehatan mental ke dalam kurikulum pendidikan tinggi belum menjadi prioritas. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji perspektif, sikap, dan kesediaan dosen dalam mengintegrasikan literasi kesehatan mental ke dalam pembelajaran, menilai potensi dampaknya terhadap kesejahteraan mental dan prestasi akademik mahasiswa, serta mengidentifikasi tantangan dan peluang implementasinya. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain metode campuran concurrent embedded. Data kualitatif sebagai data utama dikumpulkan melalui wawancara semi-terstruktur dengan delapan informan, yang terdiri atas empat pejabat struktural/ dosen, satu psikolog sebagai informan ahli, dan tiga mahasiswa, serta observasi dan studi dokumen, kemudian dianalisis secara tematik. Data kuantitatif sebagai data pendukung diperoleh melalui kuesioner skala Likert kepada 100 mahasiswa aktif Universitas Komputer Indonesia yang dipilih secara acak dan proporsional berdasarkan fakultas, kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif menggunakan persentase frekuensi. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa dosen umumnya bersikap positif terhadap integrasi literasi kesehatan mental, tetapi kesediaan implementasinya bervariasi karena keterbatasan kompetensi dan dukungan institusional. Sebanyak 68% mahasiswa sangat setuju bahwa kesehatan mental yang baik mendukung fokus belajar, sedangkan 63% sangat setuju bahwa kesehatan mental penting bagi keberhasilan akademik. Tantangan utama meliputi keterbatasan waktu kurikulum, pelatihan yang belum memadai, dan ketiadaan pedoman terstruktur. Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa model integrasi implisit (embedded model) melalui materi, metode, tugas, dan interaksi kelas relevan untuk mendukung kesejahteraan mahasiswa.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Apriyanto, S., & Anum, A. (2025). Trends in the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal Corner of Educational Research, 3(3), 218~226. https://doi.org/10.54012/ijcer.v3i3.624

Bandura, A. (2002). Social foundations of thought and action. In D. F. Marks (Ed.) Social foundations of thought and action (pp. 94-106). SAGE Publications Ltd, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446221129.n6

Bannigan, G., McGrath, D., & Matthews, J. (2025). Whole-university approaches to embedding well-being in the curriculum: A scoping review. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1534244. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1534244

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.).

D’Aniello-Heyda, C., Tambling, R. R., Kapelich, S. A., & Sundram, F. (2025). Rethinking measurement: A preliminary study of mental health literacy among college students. Cogent Psychology, 12(1), 2480421. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2025.2480421

Dehbozorgi, R., Zangeneh, S., Khooshab, E., Hafezi Nia, D., Hanif, H. R., Samian, P., Yousefi, M., Haj Hashemi, F., Vakili, M., Jamalimoghadam, N., & Lohrasebi, F. (2025). The application of artificial intelligence in the field of mental health: A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 25, 132. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-06483-2

Ferrari, M., Allan, S., Arnold, C., Eleftheriadis, D., Alvarez-Jimenez, M., Gumley, A., & Gleeson, J. F. (2022). Digital interventions for psychological well-being in university students: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(9), e39686. https://www.jmir.org/2022/9/e39686/

Goel, A., Ali, R., Upsher, R., Padickaparambil, S., Byrom, N., & Ramachandran, S. (2025). How the faculty across higher education institutes are facilitated to develop skills on student mental health and well-being?–A scoping review. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 29(4), 210-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603108.2024.2384979

Kahraman, S., Havlio?lu, S., & Kaçkin, Ö. (2024). Mental health literacy level of university students enrolled in health departments: A descriptive study in Turkey. European Journal of Mental Health, 19. https://doi.org/10.5708/EJMH.19.2024.0025

K?l?nç, N. D., & Kendirk?ran, G. (2025). Determining the mental health literacy level of university students and examining their attitudes towards seeking psychological help. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 34(1), e13506. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.13506

King, N., Linden, B., Cunningham, S., et al. (2022). The feasibility and effectiveness of a novel online mental health literacy course in supporting university student mental health: A pilot study. BMC Psychiatry, 22, 515. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04139-z

Lister, K., & Allman, Z. (2024). Embedding mental wellbeing in the curriculum: A collaborative definition and suite of examples in practice. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1157614. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1157614

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Nyakhar, S. S., & Wang, H. (2025). Effectiveness of artificial intelligence chatbots on mental health & well-being in college students: A rapid systematic review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 16, 1621768. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1621768

Rakow, K. E., Priestley, M., Byrom, N. C., Foster, J. L. H., & Dommett, E. J. (2025). Their wellbeing affects our wellbeing: Student perspectives of lecturer wellbeing and its consequences for student wellbeing. Higher Education, 90, 1065–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01365-0

Reis, A. C., Saheb, R., Moyo, T., Smith, C., & Sperandei, S. (2022). The impact of mental health literacy training programs on the mental health literacy of university students: A systematic review. Prevention Science, 23(4), 648–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-021-01283-y

Reis, A., Nguyen, V., Saheb, R., Rutherford, E., & Sperandei, S. (2023). Improving university students’ mental health literacy using experiential learning opportunities. Health Education Journal, 82(2), 184–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/00178969221147615

Shehzad, N., Nomaan, S., & Charles, T. (2026). A systematic review of AI's effect on students' mental health and well-being. In A. ElSayary & A. Shomotova (Eds.), Implications for students' mental health in the digital age: AI and cyber behavior (pp. 105–138). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-4222-1.ch005

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Upsher, R., Nobili, A., Hughes, G., & Byrom, N. (2022). A systematic review of interventions embedded in curriculum to improve university student wellbeing. Educational Research Review, 37, 100464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100464

Wilson Fadiji, A., & Eloff, I. (2024). Student wellbeing and academic support in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1119110. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1119110

World Health Organization. (2022). World mental health report: Transforming mental health for all. WHO Press. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240049338

Worsley, J. D., Pennington, A., & Corcoran, R. (2022). Supporting mental health and wellbeing of university and college students: A systematic review of review-level evidence of interventions. PLOS ONE, 17(7), e0266725. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266725

Yuen, E. K., Gangi, C. E., Barakat, K., & Harrison, F. (2025). College students’ utilization of the Internet to search for mental health information: Effects on mental health literacy, stigma, and help-seeking. Journal of American College Health, 73(3), 961–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2024.2404948

Zaza, C., & Yeung, R. C. (2023). It’s time to bring mental health literacy education into the postsecondary curriculum. The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2023.1.13663

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2

Downloads

Published

2026-10-08

How to Cite

Purwaningwulan, M. M., Yasundari, Y., Amalia, G., & Danuwiranta, S. W. (2026). PERSPECTIVES OF LECTURERS AND ITS IMPACT ON STUDENTS: THE INTEGRATION OF MENTAL HEALTH LITERACY INTO THE HIGHER EDUCATION CURRICULUM. PAEDAGOGY : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Psikologi, 6(4), 3934–3948. https://doi.org/10.51878/paedagogy.v6i4.13638

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.