BEYOND EFFECTIVENESS: INVESTIGATING STUDENT SATISFACTION WITH CHATBOT AI IN EFL ACADEMIC WRITING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51878/learning.v6i3.14907Keywords:
Academic Writing, Chatbot AI, English Language Education, Student Satisfaction, Qualitative ResearchAbstract
The integration of artificial intelligence into higher education has made chatbot AI such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity common tools used by students in academic writing, yet research on student satisfaction toward their use in the Indonesian EFL context remains limited, as most previous studies emphasized effectiveness rather than affective and pedagogical factors. Therefore, this study focused on the satisfaction of English Language Education students at Ganesha University of Education (Undiksha) toward the use of chatbot AI as an assistive tool in academic writing, and on how specific aspects of chatbot based writing support, namely grammar assistance, idea development, feedback quality, and ease of use, influenced that satisfaction. This study employed a basic qualitative approach involving 10 students from the English Language Education Study Program at Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha (Undiksha). Participants were selected using purposive sampling with criterion-based selection based on their experience in using chatbot AI for academic writing. Data were collected through semi structured, in depth interviews with ten students selected using criterion-based selection. The interview recordings were transcribed verbatim and then analyzed using thematic analysis, resulting in three main themes, namely positive but conditional satisfaction, chatbot based writing support as the main source of satisfaction, and critical user control as the boundary of satisfaction. The findings showed that students were generally satisfied because chatbot AI helped them generate ideas, organize writing, correct grammar, obtain feedback, revise sentences, and find references quickly and practically. However, this satisfaction was conditional because students still needed to verify, revise, and control AI output that could be inaccurate or too general. This study concludes that chatbot AI facilitates academic writing and increases student satisfaction when it is used critically and responsibly as a supporting tool, rather than as a replacement for students’ own thinking and writing ability.
ABSTRAK
Integrasi kecerdasan buatan dalam pendidikan tinggi telah menjadikan chatbot AI seperti ChatGPT, Gemini, dan Perplexity sebagai alat bantu yang umum digunakan mahasiswa dalam penulisan akademik. Namun penelitian mengenai kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap penggunaannya dalam konteks EFL di Indonesia masih terbatas karena sebagian besar kajian sebelumnya lebih menekankan efektivitas daripada faktor afektif dan pedagogis. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini berfokus pada kepuasan mahasiswa Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris di Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha (Undiksha) terhadap penggunaan chatbot AI sebagai alat bantu dalam penulisan akademik, serta bagaimana aspek spesifik dari dukungan penulisan berbasis chatbot, yaitu bantuan tata bahasa, pengembangan ide, kualitas umpan balik, dan kemudahan penggunaan, memengaruhi kepuasan tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dasar dengan melibatkan 10 mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha (Undiksha). Partisipan dipilih menggunakan teknik purposive sampling dengan criterion-based selection berdasarkan pengalaman mereka dalam menggunakan chatbot AI untuk penulisan akademik. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara semi terstruktur dan mendalam terhadap sepuluh mahasiswa yang dipilih menggunakan purposive sampling berbasis kriteria. Rekaman wawancara ditranskripsi secara verbatim, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan analisis tematik hingga menghasilkan tiga tema utama, yaitu kepuasan positif namun bersyarat, dukungan penulisan berbasis chatbot sebagai sumber utama kepuasan, dan kontrol kritis pengguna sebagai batas kepuasan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mahasiswa secara umum merasa puas karena chatbot AI membantu mereka menghasilkan ide, menyusun tulisan, memperbaiki tata bahasa, memperoleh umpan balik, merevisi kalimat, dan mencari referensi secara cepat dan praktis. Namun, kepuasan tersebut bersifat bersyarat karena mahasiswa tetap perlu memverifikasi, merevisi, dan mengontrol keluaran AI yang dapat tidak akurat atau terlalu umum. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa chatbot AI memfasilitasi penulisan akademik dan meningkatkan kepuasan mahasiswa ketika digunakan secara kritis dan bertanggung jawab sebagai alat pendukung, bukan sebagai pengganti pemikiran dan kemampuan menulis mahasiswa.
Downloads
References
Aladini, A., Ismail, S. M., Ahmad Saleem Khasawneh, M., & Shakibaei, G. (2025). Self-directed writing development across computer/AI-based tasks: Unraveling the traces on L2 writing outcomes, growth mindfulness, and grammatical knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 17, 100566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100566
Baidoo-Anu, D., Asamoah, D., Amoako, I., & Mahama, I. (2024). Exploring student perspectives on generative artificial intelligence in higher education learning. Discover Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00173-z
Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
Chairiah, A. M., Edi, W., & Yana, D. (2025). University students' perception of using ChatGPT toward their writing skills. Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 12(2), 948–971. https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v12i2.42797
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Debets, T., Kazem, S., Brinke, J., Vos, T. E. J., Maillette de Buy Wenniger, G., & Camp, G. (2025). Chatbots in education: A systematic review of objectives, underlying technology and theory, evaluation criteria, and impacts. Computers & Education, 234, 105323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105323
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
Giray, L., Islam, M. E., & Glo, J. A. (2026). AI hallucinations in academic writing: implications for research integrity. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-026-05494-4
Kanwar, A., & Sanjeeva, M. (2022). Student satisfaction survey: A key for quality improvement in the higher education institution. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-022-00196-6
Kartini, M. M., & Ganesha, U. P. (2025). Students' acceptance and enjoyment of ChatGPT in English language learning. Journal of Educational Study, 5(2), 171–186. https://doi.org/10.36663/joes.v5i2.1100
Khan, A. L., Hasan, M. M., Islam, M. N., & Uddin, M. S. (2024). Artificial intelligence tools in developing English writing skills: Bangladeshi university EFL students’ perceptions. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 17(2), 345-371. https://doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v17i2.24369
Laili, R. N., Wirawati, W. A., Nashir, M., Banyuwangi, S., & Naskah, H. (2024). Student's perception on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) ChatGPT in English language learning: Benefits and challenges in higher education. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 4(3), 1389-1403. https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v4i03
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications Inc.
Louis, N., Rakotoarizaka, P., Musa, H. G., & Geneina, E. (2023). The effect of perceived usefulness and perceived easy to use on student satisfaction: The mediating role of attitude to use online learning. APMBA (Asia Pacific Management and Business Application), 11(3), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.apmba.2023.011.03.5
Lubis, C. U., Ichsanda, B., Hz, R., & Lubis, U. (2024). Perplexity AI on the writing efficiency of EFL students in higher education: Students' insights. Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 8(1), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v8i1
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Michel-Villarreal, R., Vilalta-Perdomo, E., Salinas-Navarro, D. E., Thierry-Aguilera, R., & Gerardou, F. S. (2023). Challenges and opportunities of generative AI for higher education as explained by ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 13(9), 856. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090856
Mohebbi, A. (2025). Enabling learner independence and self-regulation in language education using AI tools: A systematic review. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2433814
Polakova, P., & Ivenz, P. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development of EFL students' writing skills. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2410101
Rashid, A. Bin, & Kausik, M. A. K. (2024). AI revolutionizing industries worldwide: A comprehensive overview of its diverse applications. Hybrid Advances, 7, 100277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hybadv.2024.100277
Hardiantini, L. R., Ratminingsih, N. M., Utami, I. G. A. L. P., & Santosa, M. H. (2025). The assistance of Quillbot in powering academic writing for higher students: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Dimensi Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 13(2), 266-279. https://doi.org/10.24269/dpp.v13i2.11074
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed., Global ed.).
Santosa, M. H. (2025). Investigating university students’ and lecturers’ anxiety in the AI-laden English online learning. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 58(2), 416-427. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v58i2.90847
Shofiah, N., Putera, Z. F., & Solichah, N. (2023). Challenges and opportunities in the use of artificial intelligence in education for academic writing: A scoping review. In Proceedings of the Conference Psychology and Flourishing Humanity (PFH 2023). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-188-3_20
Silitonga, J. Z., Fikri, M. S., Sujiyani, E., & Lestari, T. P. (2025). The use of writing assistance tools in writing assignments: Students' perspectives. Journal of English Language Teaching and Cultural Studies, 8(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.48181/jelts.v8i2.33691
Waziana, W., Andewi, W., & Hastomo, T. (2024). Students' perceptions of the impact of AI chatbots on vocabulary and grammar in EFL writing. Register Journal, 17(02), 352–382. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v17i2.352-382
Wiboolyasarin, W., Wiboolyasarin, K., & Tiranant, P. (2025). AI-driven chatbots in second language education: A systematic review of their efficacy and pedagogical implications. Ampersand, 14, 100224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2025.100224
Wong, W. H., & Chapman, E. (2023). Student satisfaction and interaction in higher education. Higher Education, 85(5), 957–978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00874-0
Wulandari, Y. (2022). Effective feedback to improve students’ writing skills. Educalitra: English Education, Linguistics, and Literature Journal, 1(1), 10-17. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12795486
Yeung, S. (2025). University students' engagement with generative AI-supported automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 68, 101203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101203
Yuliyanti, N. (2025). Emerging technologies in English writing: AI chatbots' benefits, challenges, and implications. Multiple: Journal of Global and Multidisciplinary, 3(1), 4553–4562. https://journal.institercom-edu.org/index.php/multiple/article/view/869/
Zahari, M., Marini, A., Safitri, D., Dewiyani, L., & Muawanah, U. (2025). Optimizing student writing performance in higher education: A quantitative study of teacher feedback and classroom environment. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101286
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 LEARNING : Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.










