ADVERSITY QUOTIENT DAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIS DALAM PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING BERBANTUAN LIVE WORKSHEET: KAJIAN LITERATUR SISTEMATIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51878/educator.v6i4.16514Keywords:
adversity quotient, kajian literatur sistematis, Live Worksheet, pemecahan masalah matematis, problem based learningAbstract
The low mathematical problem-solving ability of Indonesian lower secondary students calls for inquiry that considers not only instructional models but also students' persistence when facing difficult tasks. This article synthesises research on the relationships among Adversity Quotient (AQ), mathematical problem solving, Problem-Based Learning (PBL), and Live Worksheet-based digital worksheets. A qualitative systematic literature review was conducted on 18 publications from 2018 to 2026 selected through inclusion criteria and examined using six-phase thematic analysis. Four themes emerged. First, AQ types (climber, camper, quitter) consistently correspond to how far students progress through Polya's stages. Second, AQ contributes meaningfully but is not the sole determinant, so the design of the learning environment remains decisive. Third, PBL acts as a structured space of difficulty and generally benefits junior high school students' problem solving, although effect sizes vary. Fourth, digital worksheets provide scaffolding and immediate feedback that may support medium- and low-AQ students, yet current evidence relies mostly on short-term designs that do not disaggregate results by AQ. Future studies are recommended to treat AQ as a moderating variable in PBL implemented with digital worksheets at the junior high school level.
ABSTRAK
Rendahnya kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa sekolah menengah pertama di Indonesia menuntut kajian yang tidak hanya melihat model pembelajaran, tetapi juga daya juang siswa ketika berhadapan dengan soal yang sulit. Artikel ini bertujuan menyintesis temuan penelitian mengenai keterkaitan Adversity Quotient (AQ), kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis, model Problem Based Learning (PBL), dan lembar kerja digital berbasis Live Worksheet. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain kajian literatur sistematis. Korpus terdiri atas 18 publikasi terbitan 2018–2026 yang dipilih berdasarkan kriteria inklusi, kemudian dianalisis melalui analisis tematik enam fase. Hasil sintesis memunculkan empat tema. Pertama, tipe AQ (climber, camper, quitter) secara konsisten memetakan sejauh mana siswa mampu menempuh tahapan Polya. Kedua, AQ berkontribusi nyata tetapi bukan penentu tunggal, sehingga rancangan lingkungan belajar tetap memegang peran besar. Ketiga, PBL berfungsi sebagai ruang kesulitan yang terstruktur dan secara umum berdampak positif terhadap pemecahan masalah siswa SMP, meskipun besarnya dampak bervariasi. Keempat, lembar kerja digital menyediakan perancah dan umpan balik segera yang berpotensi menopang siswa ber-AQ sedang dan rendah, tetapi bukti empirisnya masih didominasi desain jangka pendek tanpa pemilahan berdasarkan AQ. Kajian ini merekomendasikan penelitian yang menempatkan AQ sebagai variabel peninjau dalam implementasi PBL berbantuan lembar kerja digital pada jenjang SMP.
Downloads
References
Abdiyani, S. S., Khabibah, S., & Rahmawati, N. D. (2019). Profil kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa SMP Negeri 1 Jogoroto berdasarkan langkah-langkah Polya ditinjau dari adversity quotient. Al-Khwarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 7(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.24256/jpmipa.v7i2.774
Amir, M. Z. Z., Risnawati, Nurdin, E., Azmi, M. P., & Andrian, D. (2021). The increasing of math adversity quotient in mathematics cooperative learning through metacognitive. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 841–856. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14448a
Anwar, L., Sa'dijah, C., Murtafiah, W., & Huljannah, M. (2024). Adversity quotient of Indonesian prospective mathematics teachers in solving geometry higher-order thinking skills problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp79-98
Apriliana, S., & Malasari, P. N. (2023). Pengaruh adversity quotient terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa: Systematic literatur review. JUMAT: Jurnal Matematika, 1(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.53491/jumat.v1i2.639
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Baharullah, B., Wahyuddin, W., Usman, M. R., & Syam, N. (2022). Profil kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa ditinjau dari adversity quotient (AQ). AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 1039–1051. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.4766
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Febrianti, T., Zakiah, N. E., & Ruswana, A. M. (2022). Profil kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa SMP pada materi lingkaran ditinjau dari adversity quotient (AQ). J-KIP (Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan), 3(2), 420–427. https://doi.org/10.25157/j-kip.v3i2.6569
Haryati, F., & Fitri, M. (2026). Efektivitas e-LKPD matematika berbasis problem based learning berbantuan Liveworksheets untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa. JMES (Journal Mathematics Education Sigma), 7(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.30596/jmes.v7i1.18241
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hidayat, W., & Sariningsih, R. (2018). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis dan adversity quotient siswa SMP melalui pembelajaran open ended. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 2(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v2i1.827
Hidayat, W., Wahyudin, & Prabawanto, S. (2018). The mathematical argumentation ability and adversity quotient (AQ) of pre-service mathematics teacher. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5377.239-248
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Hulaikah, M., Degeng, I. N. S., Sulton, & Murwani, F. D. (2020). The effect of experiential learning and adversity quotient on problem solving ability. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 869–884. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13156a
Kartika, R. W., Megawanti, P., & Hakim, A. R. (2021). Pengaruh adversity quotient dan task commitment terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v8i2.36831
Lestari, I. D., & Juandi, D. (2023). Students' mathematical problem solving ability reviewed from adversity quotient: Systematic literature review. Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 13(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.20961/jmme.v13i1.71234
Merritt, J., Lee, M. Y., Rillero, P., & Kinach, B. M. (2017). Problem-based learning in K–8 mathematics and science education: A literature review. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1674
Monalisa, L. A., Kristiana, A. I., Fatahillah, A., Hussen, S., & Fatimah, L. N. (2024). The development of electronic worksheets for students using Live worksheets and GeoGebra to enhance students' digital literacy. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 10(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.22219/jinop.v10i2.33688
Nasution, K. A. A., & Siregar, M. A. P. (2025). Pengaruh adversity quotient terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa. Media Pendidikan Matematika, 13(1), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.33394/mpm.v13i1.15975
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Pertiwi, S. C. I., & Kadarisma, G. (2023). Pengaruh penggunaan LKPD liveworksheet bermodelkan problem based learning materi aritmatika sosial terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa SMP. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 6(5), 1871–1882. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v6i5.19913
Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Stoltz, P. G. (1997). Adversity quotient: Turning obstacles into opportunities. John Wiley & Sons.
Suparman, S., Yohannes, Y., & Arifin, N. (2021). Enhancing mathematical problem-solving skills of Indonesian junior high school students through problem-based learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 12(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v12i1.8036
Sutisna, E., Novaliyosi, Hendrayana, A., & Mutaqin, A. (2022). Systematic literature review: Adversity quotient dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah pada pembelajaran matematika. UNION: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.30738/union.v10i2.12528
Sutisna, E., Syamsuri, S., Hendrayana, A., & Mutaqin, A. (2023). Meta-analisis: Pengaruh model problem based learning terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 3148–3161. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v7i3.1453
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 EDUCATOR : Jurnal Inovasi Tenaga Pendidik dan Kependidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
