EDUCATIONAL COMMUNICATION MANAGEMENT IN ADDRESSING ALGORITHMIC BIAS AND PUBLIC TRUST CRISIS: DIGITAL LITERACY AND AI ETHICS STRATEGIES IN INDONESIA’S DIGITAL DEMOCRACY ERA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51878/learning.v6i1.8901Keywords:
Educational Communication Management, Algorithmic Bias, Digital LiteracyAbstract
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence in Indonesia’s digital democracy has precipitated algorithmic bias and a public trust crisis, necessitating robust educational strategies. This study investigates the role of educational communication management, digital literacy, and AI ethics in mitigating these challenges and restoring institutional credibility. Employing an explanatory quantitative approach with Structural Equation Modelling (SEM), the research analyzed data from 100 purposively selected students to test the relationships between communication governance, algorithmic perception, and trust. The results reveal that educational communication management significantly enhances decision-making effectiveness (?= 0.397$), while AI ethics significantly positively influences public trust (?= 0.298). Conversely, algorithmic bias was found to substantially impact decision-making dynamics (? = 0.414). Interestingly, digital literacy demonstrated a positive yet statistically non-significant direct effect on trust variables. The study concludes that educational communication management and AI ethics are pivotal pillars for modern educational governance. To address the trust crisis and algorithmic distortions, educational institutions must implement transparent communication strategies integrated with ethical AI principles, thereby fostering an inclusive and accountable digital information ecosystem.
ABSTRAK
Kemajuan pesat kecerdasan buatan dalam demokrasi digital Indonesia telah memicu bias algoritmik dan krisis kepercayaan publik, sehingga memerlukan strategi pendidikan yang kuat. Studi ini menyelidiki peran manajemen komunikasi pendidikan, literasi digital, dan etika AI dalam mengurangi tantangan ini dan memulihkan kredibilitas institusional. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif eksploratif dengan Pemodelan Persamaan Struktural (SEM), penelitian ini menganalisis data dari 100 mahasiswa yang dipilih secara purposif untuk menguji hubungan antara tata kelola komunikasi, persepsi algoritmik, dan kepercayaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa manajemen komunikasi pendidikan secara signifikan meningkatkan efektivitas pengambilan keputusan (?= 0,397), sedangkan etika AI secara signifikan berpengaruh positif terhadap kepercayaan publik (?= 0,298). Sebaliknya, bias algoritmik ditemukan berdampak substansial pada dinamika pengambilan keputusan (? = 0,414). Menariknya, literasi digital menunjukkan pengaruh langsung yang positif namun secara statistik tidak signifikan terhadap variabel kepercayaan. Studi ini menyimpulkan bahwa manajemen komunikasi pendidikan dan etika AI merupakan pilar penting bagi tata kelola pendidikan modern. Untuk mengatasi krisis kepercayaan dan distorsi algoritmik, lembaga pendidikan harus menerapkan strategi komunikasi transparan yang terintegrasi dengan prinsip-prinsip AI yang etis, sehingga mendorong ekosistem informasi digital yang inklusif dan akuntabel.
References
Alami, A. N., Luong, D. N. A., Prihatini, E., Ramadhani, E., Go, J. R. R., Hafidzah, N., & Atiyah, U. (2023). Democratization in the digital era: Experience from Southeast Asia. Journal of ASEAN Studies, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.21512/jas.v10i2.9361
Bäcke, M., & Vigmo, S. (2024). Lost opportunities for globalisation, digitalisation, and socially sustainable education? Advocating for digital and global Bildung in Swedish upper secondary schools. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1351709
Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Farrow, R., Bai, J. Y. H., Nerantzi, C., Moore, S., Dron, J., Stracke, C. M., Singh, L., Crompton, H., Koutropoulos, A., Terentev, E., Pazurek, A., Nichols, M., Sidorkin, A. M., Costello, E., Watson, S., Mulligan, D., Honeychurch, S., … Asino, T. I. (2024). The manifesto for teaching and learning in a time of generative AI: A critical collective stance to better navigate the future. Open Praxis, 16(4), 487. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.777
Caton, A. B., Bradshaw-Wardis, D., Kinshuk, K., & Savenye, W. (2022). Future directions for digital literacy fluency using cognitive flexibility research: A review of selected digital literacy paradigms and theoretical frameworks. Journal of Learning for Development, 9(3), 381. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v9i3.818
Çetindamar, D., & Phaal, R. (2021). Technology management in the age of digital technologies. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(7), 2507. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2021.3101196
Džogovi?, S. A., Zdravkovska-Adamova, B., & Ramcilovic, Z. (2025). The role of higher education in promoting media literacy in the age of digital disinformation. Journal Human Research in Rehabilitation, 15(2), 311. https://doi.org/10.21554/hrr.092506
Gaultney, I. B., Sherron, T., & Boden, C. J. (2022). Political polarization, misinformation, and media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 14(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.23860/jmle-2022-14-1-5
Halida, R. (2020). The role of Facebook access and partisan bias on belief in misinformation: The case of 2019 Indonesia presidential election. Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 24(2), 154. https://doi.org/10.7454/hubs.asia.1290320
Igwe-Nmaju, C., & Anadozie, C. (2022). Commanding digital trust in high-stakes sectors: Communication strategies for sustaining stakeholder confidence amid technological risk. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 15(3), 609. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2022.15.3.0920
Kuswati, Y., Kusmayadi, D., & Pratomo, H. W. (2025). Maintaining public trust and reputation in the digital age. IJESS International Journal of Education and Social Science, 6(1), 133. https://doi.org/10.56371/ijess.v6i1.432
Lawitta, R., & Najdah, T. (2025). The role of critical thinking as a predictor of students’ digital literacy skills. Social: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPS, 5(1), 247. https://doi.org/10.51878/social.v5i1.5150
Macnamara, J. (2021). Challenging post-communication: Beyond focus on a ‘few bad apples’ to multi-level public communication reform. Communication Research and Practice, 7(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2021.1876404
Mata, J. C., Sabater, M. M., Valencia, G. A. G., & Fernández, A. S. (2022). Future teachers confronting extremism and hate speech. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01222-4
Mrah, I. (2022). Digital media literacy in the age of mis/disinformation: The case of Moroccan university students. Digital Education Review, 41, 176. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2022.41.176-194
Nurfieni, A., Ferricha, D., & Mahardika, A. G. (2025). Legal responsibilities of educational institutions in ensuring data protection and quality learning in digital education using smartcampus. Rechtenstudent, 73. https://doi.org/10.35719/rch.v6i1.358
Passlack, N., Hammerschmidt, T., & Posegga, O. (2025). With great power comes great responsibility: What shapes AI literacy for responsible interactions of knowledge workers with AI? Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-025-10648-5
Richard, K., & Julian, N. (2024). Ethical dimensions of ICT integration in higher education: A comprehensive review. Newport International Journal of Engineering and Physical Sciences, 4(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.59298/nijep/2024/421922.2.2200
Sayaf, A. M., Alamri, M. M., Alqahtani, M. A., & Al-Rahmi, W. M. (2021). Information and communications technology used in higher education: An empirical study on digital learning as sustainability. Sustainability, 13(13), 7074. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137074
???????, ?. [Semenets, V.], Gryshko, S., Golovianko, M., Shevchenko, O. O., Titova, L., Kaikova, O., Terziyan, V., & Tiihonen, T. (2022). How the university portal inspired changes in the academic assessment culture [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2105.14151
Shannaq, B. (2024). Unveiling the nexus: Exploring TAM components influencing professors’ satisfaction with smartphone integration in lectures: A case study from Oman. TEM Journal, 2365. https://doi.org/10.18421/tem133-63
Sogalrey, F. A. M., Safitri, F., Tijow, M. A., Sembiring, D. A. K., & Risamasu, P. E. G. (2024). Digital literacy research in education: Trends and insights. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, 10(3), 1169. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i3.12490
Soriano-Alcantara, J. M., Guillén?Gámez, F. D., & Ruiz?Palmero, J. (2024). Exploring digital competencies: Validation and reliability of an instrument for the educational community and for all educational stages. Technology Knowledge and Learning, 30(1), 307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09741-6
Tavasoli, A., Sharbaf, M., & Madani, S. (2025). Responsible innovation: A strategic framework for financial LLM integration [Preprint]. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2504.02165
TR, R. (2025). Artificial intelligence in social sciences and social work: Bridging technology and humanity to revolutionize research, policy, and human services. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Comprehensive Research, 34. https://doi.org/10.54660/ijmcr.2025.4.5.34-42
Vivó, J. M. N., & Grandío-Pérez, M. del M. (2025). Enhancing algorithmic literacy: Experimental study on communication students’ awareness of algorithm-driven news. Anàlisi, 71, 37. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/analisi.3718
Yogi, A. S., Pahriyah, S., Ani, S. I., Japar, M., & Kardiman, Y. (2025). Inovasi pembelajaran PKn di era digital dengan pemanfaatan teknologi dalam meningkatkan motivasi dan minat belajar siswa. Social: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPS, 5(2), 484. https://doi.org/10.51878/social.v5i2.5725
Zahirah, K. F., Irawan, B., & Yusuf, E. (2025). Preparing AI super users through generative AI integration in education. Cendekia: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan, 5(2), 559. https://doi.org/10.51878/cendekia.v5i2.4729
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 LEARNING : Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.













