DARI KEBOSANAN JADI KETERGANTUNGAN? STUDI PADA REMAJA PENGGUNA MEDIA SOSIAL

Wynona Christabella; Rahmah Hastuti

doi:10.51878/paedagogy.v5i3.7731

Authors

Wynona Christabella Universitas Tarumanagara
Rahmah Hastuti Universitas Tarumanagara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51878/paedagogy.v5i3.7731

Keywords:

Phubbing, Kecenderungan Bosan, Remaja, Media Sosial

Abstract

This study aims to examine the relationship between phubbing behavior and boredom proneness among adolescents. Phubbing refers to ignoring social interactions due to excessive focus on smartphone use, while boredom proneness indicates a tendency to feel bored easily. The participants in this study were 419 adolescents aged 14-17 years who actively used social media for at least two hours per day. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. Data were collected using the Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP) and the Boredom Proneness Scale-Short Form (BPS-SF). Data analysis was conducted using Spearman’s rho non-parametric correlation due to the non-normal distribution of one variable. The results revealed a significant positive correlation between phubbing behavior and boredom proneness (r = 0.444, p < 0.05), meaning that the higher the level of boredom proneness, the more likely adolescents are to engage in phubbing behavior. These findings highlight the importance of preventive measures, such as digital literacy education and boredom management training, to help adolescents use technology in a more balanced and adaptive way.

ABSTRAK

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji hubungan antara perilaku phubbing dan kecenderungan kebosanan pada remaja. Phubbing adalah perilaku mengabaikan interaksi sosial secara langsung karena terlalu fokus pada penggunaan smartphone, sementara kebosanan (boredom proneness) merujuk pada kecenderungan individu untuk merasa bosan dengan cepat. Partisipan penelitian ini adalah 419 remaja berusia 14-17 tahun yang aktif menggunakan media sosial minimal dua jam per hari. Teknik pengambilan sampel yang digunakan adalah purposive sampling. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP) dan Boredom Proneness Scale-Short Form (BPS-SF). Analisis data dilakukan dengan uji korelasi non-parametrik Spearman’s rho, karena salah satu variabel tidak berdistribusi normal. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya hubungan positif yang signifikan antara perilaku phubbing dan kebosanan (r = 0.444, p < 0.05), yang berarti semakin tinggi kecenderungan kebosanan, semakin tinggi pula kecenderungan perilaku phubbing pada remaja. Temuan ini menggarisbawahi pentingnya upaya pencegahan, seperti edukasi literasi digital dan pelatihan manajemen kebosanan, untuk membantu remaja menggunakan teknologi secara lebih seimbang dan adaptif.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahda, H., Satria, B., & Rahmawina, T. (2025). Fenomena perilaku phubbing dalam interaksi sosial mahasiswa Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Abdurrab. IRJE (Indonesian Research Journal in Education), 5(4). https://doi.org/10.31004/irje.v5i4.3256

American Academy of Pediatrics. (2019, August 1). Stages of adolescence. HealthyChildren.org. https://www.healthychildren.org/English/ages-stages/teen/Pages/Stages-of-Adolescence.aspx

Amiro, Z., & Laka, L. (2023). Pengaruh boredom proneness terhadap perilaku phubbing pada remaja di Desa Sekarmojo Kecamatan Purwosari Kab. Pasuruan. Liberosis: Jurnal Psikologi dan Bimbingan Konseling, 1(1). https://ejournal.warunayama.org/index.php/liberosis/article/view/352

Biocati, F., Mancini, G., & Agnoli, S. (2017). Boredom in adolescence: A developmental perspective. Journal of Adolescence, 60(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.07.001

Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018). The effects of “phubbing” on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(6), 304–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12506

Çikrikci, Ö., Griffiths, M. D., & Erzen, E. (2022). Testing the mediating role of phubbing in the relationship between the Big Five personality traits and satisfaction with life. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20(1), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-019-00115-z

Dewi, A.?P., Dimala, C.?P., & Pertiwi, A. (2024). Perilaku phubbing pada remaja pengguna media sosial ditinjau dari fear of missing out. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, Psikologi dan Kesehatan (J?P3K), 5(3), 670–679. https://jurnalp3k.com/index.php/j-p3k/article/view/456

Gao, X. (2023). Boredom proneness and smartphone dependency among adolescents: The mediating role of digital distraction. Computers in Human Behavior, 144, 107693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.10769

Garrido, C. E., Delgado, S. C., & Esteban, P. G. (2024). Phubbing and its impact on the individual's psychological well-being. Acta Psychologica, 248, 104388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104388

Khalili, B. G., Quraishi, T., & Fazil, S. (2024). The influence of social media on human and social communications: A sociological study. Sociology, Anthropology and Psychology, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.59535/jsh.v2i1.246

Khilji, S. (2025). Digital boredom and compulsive smartphone use: An emerging behavioral pattern in youth. CyberPsychology Review, 14(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2025.14.2.5

Lintang, S. (2025). Laporan pengguna media sosial di Indonesia 2025. Laporan Tahunan. Pemerintah Indonesia.

Nurislami, I., Suarni, N. K., & Suranata, K. (2021). Pengembangan instrumen pengukuran karakter self awareness pada masa pra remaja. Jurnal Ilmiah Bimbingan Konselin Indonesia, 6(1) 8-14. https://ejournal2.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_bk/article/view/597

Pérez-Juárez, M. Á., González-Ortega, D., & Aguiar-Pérez, J. M. (2023). Digital distractions from the point of view of higher education students. Sustainability, 15(7), 6044. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076044

Rahmayanti, R. (2022). Hubungan keaktifan dalam bermedia sosial terhadap kesehatan mental siswa. ISTISYFA: Journal of Islamic Guidance and Counseling, 1(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/istisyfa.v1i2.2419

Struk, A. A., Carriere, J. S. A., Cheyne, J. A., & Danckert, J. (2017). A short boredom proneness scale: Development and psychometric properties. Assessment, 24(3), 346–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191115609996

Tam, K.?Y.?Y., & Inzlicht, M. (2024). People are increasingly bored in our digital age. Communications Psychology, 3(2), 106. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-024-00155-9

Veriantari, G. (2021, Januari 8). Pengaruh adiksi media sosial, boredom proneness, kontrol diri, dan konformitas terhadap perilaku phubbing mahasiswa UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta [Skripsi, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta]. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta Institutional Repository. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/76844

Vodanovich, S. J., Wallace, J. C., & Kass, S. J. (2005). A confirmatory approach to the factor structure of the Boredom Proneness Scale: Evidence for a two-factor short form. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85(3), 295–303. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15327752jpa8503_05

Vodanovich, S. J. (2003). Psychometric measures of boredom: A review of the literature. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 137(6), 569–595. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00223980309600636