THE INFLUENCE OF DEBATE METHOD TO STUDENTS CRITICAL THINKING IN EFL SETTING: IN SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51878/secondary.v6i3.12808Abstract
This study aims to analyze the impact of the debate method on the development of critical thinking and speaking skills of first-grade students at an Islamic High School. The research instruments include interviews and observations, with participants divided into two groups, each consisting of three students. Debate is used as a method to train critical thinking and speaking skills, which is believed to foster leadership qualities through students' roles in teams, while transforming students from passive recipients of information into active participants who take responsibility for their learning. Data were collected through interviews, where students were asked questions related to specific topics, as well as observations that monitored students' engagement during the wrong learning process, with these interviews serving as the foundation of qualitative research to explore participants' in-depth understanding. By combining interviews and observations, this study aims to describe the effectiveness of the debate method in the context of active learning. Data analysis was carried out using a structured qualitative framework consisting of three steps: data condensation, data display, and conclusion drawing/verification. Data condensation helps summarize and filter essential information, while data display visualizes findings to facilitate analysis. The final step, conclusion drawing and verification, generates an in-depth understanding of the impact of the debate method on students' skills. The findings of this study are expected to make a significant contribution to the development of active learning methods, particularly in enhancing students' critical thinking and speaking skills. With a structured approach, this study highlights the importance of the debate method in creating more interactive and meaningful learning experiences for students.
Downloads
References
Ang, J. (2025). The danger of passive learning. Education and Industry Review, 1(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.62596/eir.ywghjn70
Atobatele, F. A., Akintayo, O. T., & Mouboua, P. D. (2024). The impact of instructional design on language acquisition in multilingual STEM classrooms. Engineering Science & Technology Journal, 5(5), 1643–1656. https://doi.org/10.51594/estj.v5i5.1113
Awuor, F. M., & Okono, E. O. (2022). ICT integration in learning of physics in secondary schools in Kenya: Systematic literature review. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 10(9), 421–461. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2022.109027
Buribayeva, A. (2026). Developing argumentative speaking skills in secondary school english classes: A communicative-cognitive perspective. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18748160
Darwin, Jaya, & Prasodjo, P. (2026). Transfer of critical thinking skills from mother tongue to English academic writing: Exploring the perspectives of multilingual students in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational and Life Sciences, 4(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijels.v4i1.259
Deroy, A. (2026). Learning to debate for improving school level education with large language models. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202602.0562.v1
Ebright, B. (2024). What do we get out of college? Measuring and teaching critical thinking skills (Tesis master, University of Michigan). Deep Blue. https://doi.org/10.7302/23749
Goodson, A. (2023). Semi-public speaking: How virtual high school debate competition increased accessibility for marginalized students. The Advocate, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.4148/2637-4552.1186
Hinck, E. (2022). Practicing critical thinking skills within a pedagogy of renewal. Journal of Communication Pedagogy, 6, 26–31. https://doi.org/10.31446/jcp.2022.1.05
Huang, Q., Muhamad, M. M., & Nawi, N. R. C. (2025). Impact of instructional design on students’ critical thinking and engagement in online English reading classes: Mediating role of motivation and moderating role of language proficiency. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1644126–1644126. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1644126
Jamil, M., Hafeez, F. A., & Muhammad, N. (2024). Critical thinking development for 21st century: Analysis of physics curriculum. Journal of Social & Organizational Matters, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.56976/jsom.v3i1.45
Kahramonovna, S. S., & Qizi, Y. S. O. (2025). Student-centered debate techniques in teaching English for non-language majors. Journal of Education and Teacher Training Innovation?, 3(2), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.61227/jetti.v3i2.193
Kunesa, F. A., Warju, W., Wailanduw, A. G., & Nur, H. R. (2026). Digital innovation in automotive education: Improving collaboration skill of student using interactive flipbook. LEARNING: Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 6(2), 1077–1090. https://doi.org/10.51878/learning.v6i2.9194
Lee, H., Chen, P. H., Wang, W., Huang, Y., & Wu, T. (2024). Empowering ChatGPT with guidance mechanism in blended learning: Effect of self-regulated learning, higher-order thinking skills, and knowledge construction. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00447-4
Lit, F., Yang, Y., Wang, F., & Li, W. (2025). The English Debating Self-Efficacy Scale: Scale development, validation, and psychometric properties. PLoS ONE, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0314879
Minh, A. N. (2024). Leveraging ChatGPT for enhancing English writing skills and critical thinking in university freshmen. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology, 3(2), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.60087/jklst.vol3.n2.p62
Mthembu, N. G., Gachie, W., & Govender, D. W. (2023). The pedagogical shift in the emergence of digital technology: Transforming teaching practices. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences, 1330–1344. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.20234112
Walker, A., & Kettler, T. (2020). Developing critical thinking skills in high ability adolescents: Effects of a debate and argument analysis curriculum. Talent, 10(1), 21–39. https://doi.org/10.46893/talent.758473
Xiaolei, S., Ismail, L., Hu, Y., & Wei, M. (2023). Strategies of content knowledge representation and EFL learners’ English writing proficiency: Mediating role of critical thinking skills. Arab World English Journal, 14(3), 309–323. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no3.19
Yulianingsih, Amin, M., Junaidi, A. N., & Elmiana, D. S. (2025). Analysis of the speaking skill development of English education students through participation in English debate competitions. Journal of English Education Forum (JEEF), 5(4), 230–235. https://doi.org/10.29303/jeef.v5i4.953
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
Zhang, Z., Sun, B., & An, P. (2025). Breaking barriers or building dependency? Exploring team-LLM collaboration in AI-infused classroom debate. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2501.09165
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 SECONDARY: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Menengah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
















