MANAJEMEN SEKOLAH PENGGERAK SEBAGAI UPAYA PENINGKATAN KUALITAS PENDIDIKAN DI KALIMANTAN TIMUR: MANAJEMEN SEKOLAH PENGGERAK SEBAGAI UPAYA PENINGKATAN KUALITAS PENDIDIKAN DI KALIMANTAN TIMUR

Elbadiansyah Elbadiansyah

doi:10.51878/manajerial.v5i1.4531

Authors

Elbadiansyah Elbadiansyah IKIP PGRI KALIMANTAN TIMUR

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51878/manajerial.v5i1.4531

Keywords:

Sekolah Penggerak, Pendidikan, Kalimantan Timur

Abstract

This study discusses the School Mover Program, School Transformation and Scope of the School Mover Program. The School Mover Program is an effort to realize the vision of Indonesian Education in realizing a sovereign, independent, and personality-based advanced Indonesia through the creation of Pancasila Students. The School Mover Program focuses on developing student learning outcomes holistically which includes competencies (literacy and numeracy) and character, starting with superior human resources (principals and teachers). The School Mover Program is a refinement of the previous school transformation program. The School Mover Program will accelerate public/private schools in all school conditions to move 1-2 stages more advanced. This research was conducted through a literature study by collecting a number of literature in the form of books and journals related to the driving teacher and the data analysis used is critical to explore more deeply about the driving teacher and the role of the driving teacher.

ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini membahas tentang Program Sekolah Penggerak, Stransformasi Sekolah dan Ruang Lingkup Program Sekolah Penggerak. Program Sekolah Penggerak adalah upaya untuk mewujudkan visi Pendidikan Indonesia dalam mewujudkan Indonesia maju yang berdaulat, mandiri, dan berkepribadian melalui terciptanya Pelajar Pancasila. Program Sekolah Penggerak berfokus pada pengembangan hasil belajar siswa secara holistik yang mencakup kompetensi (literasi dan numerasi) dan karakter, diawali dengan SDM yang unggul (kepala sekolah dan guru). Program Sekolah Penggerak merupakan penyempurnaan program transformasi sekolah sebelumnya. Program Sekolah Penggerak akan mengakselerasi sekolah negeri/swasta di seluruh kondisi sekolah untuk bergerak 1-2 tahap lebih maju. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan melalui studi pustaka dengan mengumpulkan sejumlah literature berupa buku, dan jurnal yang berkaitan dengan guru penggerak dan Analisis data yang digunakan adalah kritis untuk menelusuri lebih mendalam tentang guru penggerak dan peran guru penggerak.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Awaludin. (2018). Karakteristik pembentukan karakter di SMP Islam Terpadu Izzuddin Palembang. Muaddib: Islamic Education Journal, 1(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.19109/muaddib.v1i1.3048

Banerjee, A. V., et al. (2016). Mainstreaming an effective intervention: Evidence from randomized evaluations of “Teaching at the Right Level” in India (NBER Working Paper Series No. 22746). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Bryk, A. S., et al. (2015). Learning to improve: How America’s schools can get better at getting better. Harvard Education Press.

Darling-Hammond, L., et al. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Faruqi, A. (2019). Konsep input, proses, dan output pendidikan bermutu. [Further publication details not provided].

Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Gunawan, & Ratmono. (2018). Threats to the ideology of Pancasila in the reform era: Praxis case of regional development policy. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 9(1), 56–82. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2018.0057

Hallinger, P. (2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111116699

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2021). Buku saku Program Sekolah Penggerak.

Kraft, M. A., & Papay, J. P. (2014). Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development? Explaining heterogeneity in returns to experience. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 476–500. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713519496

Leuwol, & Gaspersz. (2020). Perubahan karakter belajar mahasiswa di tengah pandemik Covid-19. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan PKn dan Sosial Budaya, 4(1), 32–44. http://194.59.165.171/index.php/CC/article/view/355

Nurasiah et al. (2022). Nilai kearifan lokal: Projek paradigma baru program sekolah penggerak untuk mewujudkan profil pelajar Pancasila. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 3639–3648. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2727

Palupi. (2018). Internalisasi pendidikan karakter dalam pembelajaran IPS sejarah (studi kasus SMP Kebon Dalem Semarang) tahun pelajaran 2015/2016. [Further publication details not provided].

Robinson, V. M. J., et al. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509

Schildkamp, K., & Lai, M. K. (2013). Conclusions and a data use framework. In K. Schildkamp et al. (Eds.), Data-driven decision making in education: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 175–191). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4816-3_11

Tamim, R. M., et al. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654310393361