ANALISIS BIBLIOMETRIK HUBUNGAN LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, FLIPPED CLASSROOM DAN GAMIFIKASI

Elizabeth Lobo; Citra  Kurniawan; Otto  Fajarianto

doi:10.51878/edutech.v5i2.5052

Authors

Elizabeth Lobo Universitas Negeri Malang
Citra Kurniawan Universitas Negeri Malang
Otto Fajarianto Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51878/edutech.v5i2.5052

Keywords:

Bibliometric, Learning Management System, Flipped Classroom, Gamification

Abstract

The digital transformation in education has driven the massive adoption of innovative learning technologies and strategies. Learning Management System (LMS) is now the main infrastructure, which is often combined with Flipped Classroom strategy to reverse the traditional teaching method. On the other hand, Gamification is integrated to increase students’ motivation and engagement in the digital ecosystem. Despite its popularity, the conceptual map and research trends connecting these three domains have not been comprehensively identified. Therefore, this study aims to identify the research development trends and analyze the relationship structure between LMS, Flipped Classroom, and Gamification. This study uses a bibliometric analysis method on 200 articles from the Scopus database (2015-2025), which were analyzed using VOSviewer, Biblioshiny, and Publish or Perish. The results of the analysis show a significant increase in publication and citation trends in all three topics, indicating a growing academic interest. Further network mapping analysis reveals a strong symbiotic relationship: LMS serves as the technological foundation, Flipped Classroom as its main pedagogical application, and Gamification as a strategic layer to increase engagement within the framework. The conclusion of this study confirms that the integration of the three has formed a dominant paradigm in the digital education literature, providing guidance for practitioners and direction for future research.

ABSTRAK
Transformasi digital dalam pendidikan telah mendorong adopsi teknologi dan strategi pembelajaran inovatif secara masif. Learning Management System (LMS) kini menjadi infrastruktur utama, yang sering kali dikombinasikan dengan strategi Flipped Classroom untuk membalik metode pengajaran tradisional. Di sisi lain, Gamifikasi diintegrasikan untuk meningkatkan motivasi dan keterlibatan siswa dalam ekosistem digital tersebut. Meskipun populer, peta konseptual dan tren riset yang menghubungkan ketiga domain ini belum teridentifikasi secara komprehensif. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi tren perkembangan riset dan menganalisis struktur hubungan antara LMS, Flipped Classroom, dan Gamifikasi. Studi ini menggunakan metode analisis bibliometrik terhadap 200 artikel dari basis data Scopus (2015-2025), yang dianalisis menggunakan VOSviewer, Biblioshiny, dan Publish or Perish. Hasil analisis menunjukkan tren publikasi dan sitasi yang meningkat signifikan pada ketiga topik, menandakan minat akademis yang terus tumbuh. Analisis pemetaan jaringan lebih lanjut mengungkap adanya hubungan simbiosis yang kuat: LMS berfungsi sebagai fondasi teknologi, Flipped Classroom sebagai aplikasi pedagogis utamanya, dan Gamifikasi sebagai lapisan strategis untuk meningkatkan keterlibatan dalam kerangka tersebut. Simpulan penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa integrasi ketiganya telah membentuk sebuah paradigma dominan dalam literatur pendidikan digital, memberikan panduan bagi praktisi dan arah bagi riset di masa depan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abadi, M., et al. (2016). TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1605.08695

Aidoo, B., et al. (2022). Transforming teaching with ICT using the flipped classroom approach: Dealing with COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 12(6), 421. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12060421

Alqahtani, A. Y., & Rajkhan, A. A. (2020). E-learning critical success factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comprehensive analysis of e-learning managerial perspectives. Education Sciences, 10(9), 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090216

Alqurashi, E. (2019). Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553562

Antonaci, A., et al. (2019). The effects of gamification in online learning environments: A systematic literature review. Informatics, 6(3), 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics6030032

Anuar, A., et al. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of immigration and environmental degradation: Evidence from past decades. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(9), 13729–13741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16470-1

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Atmojo, A. E. P., & Nugroho, A. (2020). EFL classes must go online! Teaching activities and challenges during COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Register Journal, 13(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i1.49-76

Basal, A. (2015). The implementation of a flipped classroom in foreign language teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(4), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.72185

Bataineh, K. B. A., et al. (2019). The effect of blended learning on EFL students’ grammar performance and attitudes: An investigation of Moodle. Arab World English Journal, 10(1), 324–334. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no1.27

Bond, M., et al. (2018). Digital transformation in German higher education: Student and teacher perceptions and usage of digital media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1

Burke, A. S., & Fedorek, B. (2017). Does “flipping” promote engagement?: A comparison of a traditional, online, and flipped class. Active Learning in Higher Education, 18(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417693487

Donthu, N., et al. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Evseeva, A., & Solozhenko, A. (2015). Use of flipped classroom technology in language learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 205–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.006

Gariou-Papalexiou, A., et al. (2017). Implementing a flipped classroom: A case study of biology teaching in a Greek high school. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18(3), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.328932

Gaševi?, D., et al. (2016). Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: The effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success. The Internet and Higher Education, 28, 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.002

Harzing, A.-W. (2023). Publish or Perish [Computer software]. Harzing.com. https://harzing.com/resources/publish-or-perish

Khaldi, A., et al. (2023). Gamification of e-learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00227-z

Khidirova, S., et al. (2025). Foreign language teaching technologies. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.15212228

Koo, C. L., et al. (2016). Impact of flipped classroom design on student performance and perceptions in a pharmacotherapy course. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(2), 33. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe80233

Lawson, C., et al. (2016). Identification of ‘at risk’ students using learning analytics: The ethical dilemmas of intervention strategies in a higher education institution. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(5), 957–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9459-0

Lento, C. (2016). Promoting active learning in introductory financial accounting through the flipped classroom design. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 8(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-01-2015-0005

Nouri, J. (2016). The flipped classroom: For active, effective and increased learning – especially for low achievers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0032-z

O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002

O?adowicz, A. (2020). Modified blended learning in engineering higher education during the COVID-19 lockdown—Building automation courses case study. Education Sciences, 10(10), 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10100292

Reis, A. C. B., et al. (2020). Prospects for using gamification in Industry 4.0. Production, 30. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6513.20190094

Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. I. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: A survey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006

Turnbull, D., et al. (2020). Learning management systems, an overview. In A. Tatnall (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education and information technologies (pp. 1052–1058). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_248

Urh, M., et al. (2015). The model for introduction of gamification into e-learning in higher education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 388–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.154

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2023). VOSviewer manual. Universiteit Leiden.