ANALISIS MODEL MANAJEMEN KORIDOR EKOLOGI TAMAN NASIONAL GUNUNG HALIMUN SALAK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51878/cendekia.v5i3.6824Keywords:
koridor ekologi, koridor konservasi, satwa liar, ekologi perkotaan/agroAbstract
This research is motivated by habitat fragmentation in Mount Halimun Salak National Park (TNGHS), which threatens the biodiversity and ecological function of its connecting corridors. The gap between the theoretical focus on corridor design and the lack of practical management guidance in the field, particularly amidst high human activity pressures, drives the urgency of this study. Therefore, this research focuses on analyzing various ecological corridor management models and formulating an adaptive and relevant framework for TNGHS. This research employed library research with a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach. Secondary data from various scientific literature were systematically analyzed using qualitative synthesis and thematic analysis techniques to identify best practices. Key findings indicate that effective corridor management must go beyond physical design and integrate the mitigation of artificial barriers, riparian zone management, and integrated agricultural and settlement management. It concludes that the TNGHS corridor management model must be holistic, incorporating agroecological principles, multi-stakeholder collaboration, and an understanding of animal movement ecology to ensure long-term landscape connectivity amidst complex socio-economic dynamics.
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh fragmentasi habitat di Taman Nasional Gunung Halimun Salak (TNGHS) yang mengancam keanekaragaman hayati dan fungsi ekologis koridor penghubungnya. Adanya kesenjangan antara fokus teori pada desain koridor dan minimnya panduan pengelolaan praktis di lapangan, terutama di tengah tekanan aktivitas manusia yang tinggi, mendorong urgensi studi ini. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini berfokus untuk menganalisis berbagai model manajemen koridor ekologi dan merumuskan kerangka kerja yang adaptif dan relevan bagi TNGHS. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi kepustakaan (library research) dengan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif-analitis. Data sekunder dari berbagai literatur ilmiah dianalisis secara sistematis menggunakan teknik sintesis kualitatif dan analisis tematik untuk mengidentifikasi praktik terbaik. Temuan utama menunjukkan bahwa pengelolaan koridor yang efektif harus melampaui desain fisik dan mengintegrasikan mitigasi hambatan buatan, manajemen zona riparian, serta pengelolaan pertanian dan pemukiman secara terpadu. Disimpulkan bahwa model manajemen koridor TNGHS harus bersifat holistik, menggabungkan prinsip agroekologi, kolaborasi multi-pemangku kepentingan, dan pemahaman ekologi pergerakan hewan untuk memastikan konektivitas lanskap jangka panjang di tengah dinamika sosial-ekonomi yang kompleks.
References
Anugrah, S., et al. (2022). Analisis keselarasan integrasi RZWP3K dan RTRW Provinsi Kepulauan Riau (kasus: Lingkungan pesisir Pulau Bintan). Journal of Marine Research, 11(3), 455. https://doi.org/10.14710/jmr.v11i3.31691
Arroyo?Rodríguez, V., et al. (2020). Designing optimal human?modified landscapes for forest biodiversity conservation. Ecology Letters, 23(9), 1404–1420. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13535
Astuti, P., et al. (2025). Peran pemerintah daerah dalam mencegah kerusakan lingkungan akibat pembabatan hutan secara liar di Kabupaten Dompu (studi pada Balai Kesatuan Pengelolan Hutan Toffo Pajo Soromandi). CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan, 5(3), 1283. https://doi.org/10.51878/cendekia.v5i3.6151
Belote, R. T., et al. (2016). Identifying corridors among large protected areas in the United States. PLoS ONE, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154223
Clough, Y., et al. (2020). Field sizes and the future of farmland biodiversity in european landscapes. Conservation Letters, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12752
Crespín, S., & Simonetti, J. (2018). Reconciling farming and wild nature: integrating human–wildlife coexistence into the land-sharing and land-sparing framework. Ambio, 48(2), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1059-2
Doherty, T., & Driscoll, D. (2018). Coupling movement and landscape ecology for animal conservation in production landscapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1870), 20172272. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.2272
Huang, J., et al. (2020). Importance of spatio–temporal connectivity to maintain species experiencing range shifts. Ecography, 43(4), 591. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04716
Jeanneret, P., et al. (2021). Agroecology landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 36(8), 2235–2257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-021-01248-0
Kovács?Hostyánszki, A., et al. (2017). Ecological intensification to mitigate impacts of conventional intensive land use on pollinators and pollination. Ecology Letters, 20(5), 673–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12762
Kozakiewicz, C., et al. (2018). Pathogens in space: advancing understanding of pathogen dynamics and disease ecology through landscape genetics. Evolutionary Applications, 11(10), 1763–1778. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12678
Kremen, C. (2020). Ecological intensification and diversification approaches to maintain biodiversity, ecosystem services and food production in a changing world. Emerging Topics in Life Sciences, 4(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1042/etls20190205
Kuijper, D., et al. (2016). Paws without claws? ecological effects of large carnivores in anthropogenic landscapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 283(1841), 20161625. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.1625
Ledda, A., et al. (2019). The effect of rural buildings on landscape fragmentation in Natura 2000 sites: A case study in Sardinia. Sustainability, 11(17), 4695. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11174695
Mitchell, M., et al. (2015). Reframing landscape fragmentation's effects on ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30(4), 190–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.01.011
Nor, T., & Aslamiah, A. (2025). Strategi kepemimpinan visioner dalam implementasi visi dan misi berbasis kearifan lokal. CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan, 5(1), 126. https://doi.org/10.51878/cendekia.v5i1.4155
Pelu, H., et al. (2025). Strategi implementasi pelatihan berbasis manajerial agility di Balai Diklat Keagamaan Makassar. SOCIAL: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPS, 5(1), 229. https://doi.org/10.51878/social.v5i1.4889
Ramiadantsoa, T., et al. (2015). Large-scale habitat corridors for biodiversity conservation: A forest corridor in Madagascar. PLoS ONE, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132126
Retnawati, L., et al. (2025). Stategi manajemen mutu untuk meningkatkan efektivitas pembelajaran. MANAJERIAL: Jurnal Inovasi Manajemen Dan Supervisi Pendidikan, 4(4), 269. https://doi.org/10.51878/manajerial.v4i4.4180
Schwabl, P., et al. (2017). Prediction and prevention of parasitic diseases using a landscape genomics framework. Trends in Parasitology, 33(4), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2016.10.008
Situmorang, M. T. N. (2024). Mitigasi satwa liar di koridor ekologi Taman Nasional Gunung Halimun Salak. CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan, 4(3), 271. https://doi.org/10.51878/cendekia.v4i3.3114
Thurman, L. L., et al. (2020). Persist in place or shift in space? Evaluating the adaptive capacity of species to climate change [Review of Persist in place or shift in space? Evaluating the adaptive capacity of species to climate change]. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 18(9), 520. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2253
Tribot, A., et al. (2018). Integrating the aesthetic value of landscapes and biological diversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 285(1886), 20180971. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.0971
Westphal, D., et al. (2021). Primate landscape genetics: a review and practical guide. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 30(3), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21891
Wittemyer, G., et al. (2019). Behavioural valuation of landscapes using movement data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 374(1781), 20180046. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0046
